Would lithium make the Toyota Prius 4 much better?
Or is a split battery approach the best option for the fourth generation Prius?
When Toyota launched the third generation Toyota Prius without lithium, there was some disappointment. Likewise, when Toyota announced that the 2012 Toyota Camry hybrid would also continue to use NiMH batteries, there was further disappointment.
However, I’ve never agreed with this NiMH-based disappointment, and while I think the fourth generation Toyota Prius 4 will offer lithium, I believe NiHM could still play an important role in Toyota’s hybrids for some time.
In my opinion, if lithium was obviously so much better than NiMH for hybrid cars, then the lithium-powered Hyundai Sonata hybrid, for example, would offer better pricing and fuel economy advantages compared to the Camry hybrid. But it doesn’t. In fact, the new Camry hybrid offers a far more cost-effective package, especially based on some real world tests that found Sonata hybrid fuel economy missed its EPA-rating by as much as 10 mpgs.
Nevertheless, lithium is going to replace NiMH in most hybrid cars, eventually, and Toyota is slowly making this transition. For instance, in Europe and Japan Toyota is already switching to lithium in the Prius V. Likewise, the Prius plug-in hybrid will also rely on lithium. Consequently, once Toyota stabilizes its lithium supply chains, it only makes sense to quickly convert the fourth generation Prius 4 into a lithium hybrid. It’s simply the best path to a scalable battery advantage.
But that doesn’t mean that Toyota should completely kill off NiMH.
For instance, why not keep NiMH in the smaller and cheaper Prius C in the short term? Such a move could probably help keep costs down by enabling Toyota to take full advantage of its NiMH investments. Likewise, perhaps Toyota could continue to build the NiMH-based third generation Prius as the cheaper base model of the conventional Toyota Prius — something Toyota considered doing with the 2nd gen Prius when the 3rd gen Prius was heading for launch.
Unlike any other automaker, Toyota has a very significant NiMH advantage, and if they can use that advantage to build the most cost-effective hybrids, they should. Ultimately, moving hybrid technology further into the mainstream — a key long term goal of Toyota — isn’t dependent upon the name of the battery technology used, but the price.


I own a 2010 3rd genertation Prius. Based on 36,000 miles of driving, I would not buy another Prius.
The gas mileage promises by Toyota has not been realized. I average 39-40 miles mpg. The car has only required regular maintenance. The dealership claims that Winter driving brings down gas mileage 10%, but that should leave an average of 44(H) and 47(C).
I recommend Toyota remove the horizontal support dividing the two windows of the hatchback. Visibility is not good and soot/mud collect on the bottom part of the glass and back bumper due to the way the wind is channeled and trapped between the bumper and horizontal support.
Due to the angle of the front windshield, the rear view mirror interferes with good visibility towards the center right.
The portion of the front dashboard over the front light indictors, e.g., mileage, speed, etc., needs to extend forward to block the light front reflecting on the front windshield. At nightime, I need to regularly turn down the brightness in order to eliminate the reflection from the front panel lights which creates a blue bar across the front windshield.
Good news for the Toyota Prius lover. Their hybrid car will become now much better.
People want that Toyota Prius the first successful hybrid car should become much better and better, But due to some incidence happens after launching Prius. Their is little bit negative thinking towards Prius take place in peoples mind.
I personally feel that Toyota will defiantly solve all the issues & bugs related to Hybrid car Prius.