Maybe hydraulic hybrids make perfect sense

Chrysler and the EPA will work together on hydraulic hybrid vehicles - hybrids that don't use batteries.

A hybrid without a battery.

Who says hybrids need batteries?

Yesterday we learned that Chrysler was finally getting back into the hybrid game, but we didn’t yet know that part of Chrysler’s hybrid plan was to develop hydraulic hybrid vehicles based on the EPA’s technology.

While Hybridcarblog has covered hydraulic hybrids in the past, perhaps we weren’t as excited as we should have been.

Today, there aren’t many hydraulic hybrids on the road and most are large delivery and garbage trucks, but when put into application these hybrid vehicles have shown significant improvements in fuel economy. And more important, this efficiency is gained without a costly battery. Furthermore, this technology just might scale into smaller passenger vehicles.

According to the AP, Chrysler believes they can add this technology to minivans and pickup trucks to achieve a 35 percent increase in fuel economy, and demonstration vehicles should be hitting the pavement by 2013 or earlier.

Unfortunately, the big question is still: How much does such technology cost? Is this technology significantly cheaper than battery technologies? Which offers more bang for the buck? Additionally, could this technology eventually scale into even smaller vehicles?

Ultimately, the real appeal of hydraulic hybrids is the lack of dependence upon foreign lithium and, probably, foreign battery manufacturers, especially since a huge percent of battery profits will be found in lithium mining to cell-production – long before these technologies reach US shores. Thus a big dependence upon batteries could possibly lead to more foreign auto jobs.

If hydraulic hybrids can keep more money and more jobs in the US while achieving 35 percent gains in fuel economy, they make perfect sense to me.

Didn't find the hybrid car or electric vehicle information you wanted? Try another search.