GM - Chrysler merger. Why?
Focused on saving jobs?For a while analysts speculated that GM was interested in Chrysler because Chrysler had about $11 billion in cash that GM very much needed. However, since it will take about $10 billion of tax payer money to merge Chrysler into GM, where's the gain? Why not just give them the money to work through the credit crisis independently?
None of the Big 3 have demonstrated that they are yet ready to compete in the new automotive world. The Chevy Volt is the only thing for the Big 3 to hang their hat on, but the Volt still has not been proven in the real world , and it won't be for more than 2 years. Moreover, GM's new small car hope, the Chevy Cruze, is probably going to be delayed.
Thus, how does a merger with Chrysler make GM more competitive? How does it make GM's products more competitive? While this merger might help save US auto jobs - a noble goal - will it make the US auto industry any more successful? And, is trying to save jobs on the back of a yet unproven business model wise?
Labels: chevy volt, chrysler, GM




















