Comments on: Fire hazard: Deceit at Government Motors?

By: James

James — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:50:42 +0000

I was told that GM is making a mad dash across the country to all the emergency responders to teach them how to safely rescue someone who has a wreck in this tin can.
It seems there is high voltage running through it and in a crash, if things don’t go well, somebody might get electricuted..
What about a wreck in the water???????????????

Mark my words, people will die because Obama Motors didn’t do their homework.

By: dahcredyns

dahcredyns — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:05:55 +0000

i’ll ring the door bell.

and, just for the record, while it is Democrats in Michigan in this particular case, that wasn’t a rip on dems in favor of repubs. i threw that in there under these circumstances just because of the underlying relationships, and the potential for a much larger ‘conspiracy’ surrounding the government’s role in the auto industry.

inevitably, I firmly believe both parties are well deserving of a “bag of flaming dog poop on their door”.

By: sheckyvegas

sheckyvegas — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:41:21 +0000

Oh, the answer is easy. Greed. GM doesn’t give two shits about it’s safety, if it can ignore a problem long enough to get a profit.
And ANY politician from Michigan, whether Dem or Rep, is going to play into the Big 3’s hands, because they know that’s where their major donations are going to come from.
It’s like out here in Nevada. Any politician or politico-wannabe is going to suck up to the casino lobby because that’s where the money is.
However, a full investigation into GM’s safety standards is warranted and should proceed post-haste. Or, as a last resort, we could leave a bag of flaming dog poop on their door and run…

By: sheckyvegas

sheckyvegas — Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:38:21 +0000

Oh, the answer is easy. Greed. GM doesn’t give two shits about it’s safety, if it can ignore a problem long enough to get a profit.
And ANY