Study - Energy costs much more than consumers pay
And plug-ins don't help much if coal-poweredSome great information coming out of the “Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use” study completed by the National Research Council for Congress.
Essentially, America's energy paradigm costs Americans MUCH more than what we pay at the gas pump or in our utility bills. In 2005, for instance, America's 'hidden' costs of energy production added an extra $120 billion in health costs, not including "damages from climate change, harm to ecosystems, effects of some air pollutants such as mercury, and risks to national security, which the report examines but does not monetize."
So, in reality, the costs are even far greater, and converting to grid-powered plug-in vehicles is no quick fix, at least in terms of health costs.
"Electric vehicles and grid-dependent (plug-in) hybrid vehicles showed somewhat higher nonclimate damages than many other technologies for both 2005 and 2030. Operating these vehicles produces few or no emissions, but producing the electricity to power them currently relies heavily on fossil fuels; also, energy used in creating the battery and electric motor adds up to 20% to the manufacturing part of life-cycle damages."
Of course, if national security costs had been monetized, then some of these health costs would be negated.
Consequently, the reports suggests that, "major initiatives to further reduce other emissions, improve energy efficiency, or shift to a cleaner electricity-generating mix (e.g., renewables, natural gas, nuclear) could substantially reduce external effects’ damages, including those from grid-dependent hybrid and electric vehicles."
Labels: electric cars, fuel efficiency, plug-in hybrid vehicles



4 Comments:
That's why many electric vehicle owners also have solar panels.
If you charge your EV with power made from solar panels you are not adding to the problem.
Dahc,
Can I just say a huge bravo on the latest series of posts citing studies?! These are excellent food for thought and discussion. It takes a lot of work to find these studies and summarize, but I think they are perfect match for your blog. If the goal is to have a critical eye towards what will REALLY work, we need to read and discuss the latest studies.
If you think about it, the questions you are raising in your posts and we are all discussing in the comments, are the same questions being raised in leading edge research.
Now, I'm off to read that study. I'm dying to know what they say about plugin vs ICE GHG emissions.
smurf-
that's why i think there should be a special combo tax credit for solar and EV owners.
thanks, alcatholic.
hopefully, our discussions can help lead to solutions in some way.
Post a Comment
<< Home