Kill Detroit or give me a moonshot
Can't we all just drive Segways?Of course not. We need automobiles. Yet, maybe automobiles aren't as important as they used to be, and that should be embraced. Still, automobiles are going to continue to be an important part of America's future.
Thus, a viable auto industry is essential to America's future. Even Japanese automakers want a strong US auto industry. Without those jobs, many more Americans won't be able to buy new Honda's and Toyota's.
Fortunately, I've been pretty impressed with how Obama and Congress have dealt with Detroit so far. Instead of just rushing tens of billions to them, viability plans have been required - plans that require serious negotiations with all vested parties. Similarly, some pretty strong statements have come out of the White House and Congress. (Then again, who knows what is going on behind closed doors. Perhaps Nancy Pelosi has already assured Ron Gettelfinger of the bottom line.)
Nonetheless, without everything going perfectly in the next few years, the Big 3 are not going to be viable, as I blogged yesterday. Even worse, if the future is going to be driven by efficiency, the Big 3 have a horrible record, especially in terms of profitability.
And, without a serious surge in gasoline prices - even greater than this past summer - I just don't see how the Big 3 can compete at efficiency if the nation moves towards a model that California, and many other states, are embracing. That's Honda's specialty, not GM or Chrysler.
Ironically, however, the kind of gas price surge that would make efficiency profitable would probably keep the annual run rate of vehicle sales below anything the Big 3 can survive without major re-organization.
So, why don't we accept this as reality? Change is inevitable. Can we really hope and subsidize our way out of such a conundrum?
America needs a bigger, transparent vision of the future when it comes to energy and automobiles. Inevitably, we need a moonshot or a far more serious, honest reorganization plan. Otherwise we're gambling a lot of money on terrible odds.
If taxpayers are going to have to subsidize the US auto industry for the next decade, let's be honest right now. And, let's make those subsidies dependent upon a real plan to end foreign oil dependency by 2020.
Labels: bailout, Foreign Oil Dependency



3 Comments:
Right on!
I seriously believe that the Chevy Volt will be Detroit's first moonshot.
I don't think it can be underestimated how attractive the convenience of being able to cheaply fuel your car at home with electricity, or on the street (once street plugs are installed) is going to be for the consumer.
And being fully flex fueled so that it could also run on E85 in Brazil and M85 in China (now the largest automobile market in the world), this vehicle could be a huge global winner, IMO, and a model for things to come.
Marcel F. Williams
http://newpapyrusmagazine.blogspot.com/
I certainly believe in the potential of the Volt, but I think its costs could be a problem for some time.
Also, with a move towards a VMT tax, rather than gas taxes, to fund transportation infrastructure, many of the benefits of the Volt - and any other efficient technology - could be severely minimized.
Ultimately, I think the car might be losing its relevance in American culture, especially amongst the future, the millennials. And, inevitabley and as counter-intuitive as it might seem, that could be a good thing.
Live closer to work. Better public transportation. Car sharing. Radically different automobiles, such as super scooters that offer car-like protection, for instance.
Still, back to moonshots, the Volt won't make any profits for GM for many years.
At the same time, the annual run rate of auto sales might fall below 10,000 units for a while, even a few years. In such a case, the Volt can't come close to saving Detroit.
If that's a potential reality, I think it should be seriously addressed today.
Ultimately, I think the reality of Detroit is far more dire than Big 3 Execs, Congress, the White House - even the people - are willing to accept. Certainly, I could be wrong, but if I'm right, then I say we figure out a way to turn this negative into a positive. Into a moonshot.
Post a Comment
<< Home