Vermont ruling almost guarantees hybrid future

Will the EPA be forced to work with states on emissions?

"There is no question that the GHG (greenhouse gas) regulations present great challenges to automakers," Judge William Sessions III, sitting in the U.S. District Court in Burlington, wrote at the conclusion of his 240-page decision.

He added, "History suggests that the ingenuity of the industry, once put in gear, responds admirably to most technological challenges. In light of the public statements of industry representatives, (the) history of compliance with previous technological challenges, and the state of the record, the court remains unconvinced automakers cannot meet the challenges of Vermont and California's GHG regulations."

Many believe this ruling will now set a precedent that other states, such as California, are also seeking, enabling such states to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, something that almost guarantees the need for significant fleets of hybrid cars and other advanced technologies.

Sure, some critics, such as Karl on Cars, are going to complain that global warming is not being caused by humans and such changes are an expensive waste of time.

I say hold on.

Even if it is proven that global warming is not being caused by humans, the process of trying to end global warming emissions will have a huge impact on fuel economy and foreign oil dependency. Thus, even if you don't believe in global warming, isn't it time to address energy security?