Does Edmunds.com hate Toyota?

Is Edmunds.com biased against Toyota?

Yesterday, some eco-activists used Toyota to bring some attention to global warming. Essentially, the protesters questioned Toyota's environmental commitment and their apparent hypocrisy on the matter claiming that producing hybrid cars doesn't balance also producing gas-guzzlers.

“Building Priuses does not give Toyota license to mass-produce the Tundra,” said Sarah Connolly, the co-director of the Freedom from Oil campaign for Rainforest Action Network. “If Toyota really believed in curbing global warming, why did they argue with the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers in the Supreme Court that CO2 is not a pollutant and that the EPA should not have the right to help regulate greenhouse gas emissions?”

Edmunds.com took license to title this action 2007 New York Auto Show: Anti-Toyota Activists arrested. In reality, these activists are not anti-Toyota per se, rather, these activists are anti-gas guzzling - a U.S. automaker speciality. Since U.S. automakers aren't really doing anything to help the environment, Toyota is the natural scapegoat to use for this global warming message. That's fine, but why did Edmunds use the story as an indictment against Toyota, instead of an indictment against gas-guzzling - the real point of these activists?