Honda: Fuel cell cars mass-produced by 2018

Honda is claiming that fuel cell cars could be mass-produced by 2018. "In 2018, I believe the development (of a fuel-cell car) will have been very advanced," Honda president Takeo Fukui said in an interview with Kyodo News today. "It will become a real possibility to a large degree." (more)

A "real possibility"? Wow! We've been hearing about this "real possibility" for decades. Sure fuel cell vehicles might be mass-produced by 2018, but they might still cost more than 100,000 apiece, maybe even much more.

I became interested in hybrid cars because of my interest in the hydrogen economy and fuel cell vehicles. Ultimately, however, I realized that fuel cell cars were at least a decade away from reality and hybrids became, minimally, the short term solution to foreign oil dependency and global warming. Still, it appeared that hybrid vehicles, such as the Prius, were also providing a foundation for fuel cell vehicles. Consequently, I came to believe that investing in such hybrid vehicles made the path to fuel cell vehicles shorter. Even before full fuel cell vehicles, plug-in hybrid vehicles could utilize small fuel cells to increase their fuel efficiency - another step in making full fuel cell vehicles cheaper.

Lately; however, I have become somewhat annoyed by fuel cell vehicle talk. First, the vehicles cost almost $1 million apiece. Second, where are these vehicles going to fuel up? Third, the best of hybrid technology could be used, in just a couple of years, to mass-produce carbon-fiber plug-in hybrid vehicles with a capability of more than 100 mpg for a cost less than $50,000 apiece. Small hybrids could be far cheaper.

What the hell are we talking about 2018 for then? Let's do everything we can to today, not wait until 2018. Besides, mass-producing hybrids, especially next generation hybrids, creates a very nice platform to slowly develop fuel cells until costs can be driven down.

Everything in place for carbon fiber plug-in hybrid vehicles

I love Toyota's hottest concept vehicle, the FT-HS hybrid sports car because it uses carbon fiber and next generation hybrid technology. While the FT-HS isn't a plug-in hybrid, the fact that it utilizes lithium-ion technology demonstrates that plug-in technology is close at hand, as lithium-ion battery technology will be key. More important, the fact that the 0-60 in 4 seconds FT-HS hybrid could be sold for $60,000 further highlights the fact that ultra-light, advanced hybrids don't have to be ridiculously expensive. Add this technology to a Prius, not so focused on speed and power, and the costs will be far less. The technology to build carbon-fiber plug-in hybrid vehicles that could increase U.S. fuel economy by more than 50 percent is basically available today and the technology pays for itself via fuel economy.

Two hybrids in CNN's Best of Best for 2006

Surprise, surprise. The Toyota Prius was named as the Best Fuel Economy car for 2006 by CNN, not only because it's the most fuel efficient vehicle in the U.S., but because the Prius, "also happens to be a comfortable and practical family car." Also, while not mentioned specifically, the Toyota Camry hybrid was mentioned as part of the Camry's Best Selling award. "The hybrid Camry has less trunk space than the non-hybrid version, but it can cruise at speeds of up to 40 miles per hour without using its gasoline engine. (The gas engine is needed to accelerate up to cruising speed, though.)"

(Full CNN Story)

Toyota's N Platform: A shot across the bow of every automaker

Toyota is developing a new production platform called the N Platform. The N Platform is a production-ready platform for both the next-gen Lexus IS and GS sedans, as well as the platform for a few Japan-only Toyotas, in addition to the hybrid FT-HS sports concept vehicle. This new front-engine, rear drive flexible component production platform can be used for conventional-engined vehicles and hybrid vehicles. Additionally, as with the FT-HS, this platform can also accommodate carbon-fiber paneled automobiles.

So what! So what?

Imagine a $60,000 sports car that goes from 0 to 60 in 4 seconds, yet achieves the fuel efficiency of a four-cylinder compact car available in a T-roof with a hubless steering wheel using drive-by-wire technology. Imagine how much of this N Platform technology could revolutionize the Toyota Prius, for example.

Toyota's N platform is a shot across the bow of every other automaker in the world, a warning that Toyota isn't going to become complacent with success. Instead, Toyota is going to push their efficient production process to the next generation. Watch out world, Toyota is stating, the best is yet to come.

FT-HS hybrid sports car: "Hybrid-clever and Ferrari-fast"

Wow! That's the first word that comes to my mind after reading Angus MacKenzie's take on Toyota's newest hybrid concept car, the FT-HS. While this is a concept vehicle, it is also a production-ready concept according to what Toyota has told MacKenzie. There are so many larger implications for the auto industry brought forth by this hybrid sports car and I don't know where to even begin. So, I'll get back to those issues later. For now; however, check out the Angus article, it's absolutely a must-read for hybrid fans.

First Look: Toyota FT-HS concept

Climate change demands fuel efficiency, not ethanol

"The most direct impact of climate change will be on China's grain production," deputy director of the National Climate Center, Luo Yong told the Science Times newspaper.

What about America's grain production? Is America some how immune?

Global warming and climate change are almost assuredly going to result in massive natural disasters, droughts and severe weather swings that could destroy entire crops for years or even decades. What condition would the U.S. be in if our food and fuel crops were wiped out by a climate change disaster, even if just for one year? How can you fight global warming if you don't have any grain to convert to fuel? How many people would starve?

Isn't it time to accept the serious possibility that going green by going yellow might be impossible and even harmful?

Technology provides the possibility of producing automobiles, even SUVs, that are 75 percent more fuel efficient than today based on Today's technology - not on fuel cells nor the hydrogen economy.

Carbon-fiber plug-in hybrid vehicles would enable the far majority of Americans to use only electricity to power their vehicles almost ALL of the time. Still, in an emergency, such hybrids could still use ethanol, gasoline, diesel, hydrogen etc. if electricity was not available.

Isn't it time to set aside political pork and payoffs? Isn't it time to get serious?

Why Ford stock might not be a bad idea

Ford stock is dirt cheap, but not many analysts would recommend a buy on the stock and probably with good reason.

Still, one has to take note of Ford's new leader, Alan Mulally. Mulally is a long time fan of Toyota, particularly due to Toyota's manufacturing process - a process he hoped to replicate as an executive at Boeing. In fact, Mulally has called himself "a disciple of the Toyota production system," according to the DetroitNews. Moreover, when Mulally, along with the leaders of GM and Chrysler, met with the President a couple of months ago, it was Mulally whom was by far the most optimistic. It just seems as if Mulally realizes that the future of American automakers will require a revolution in process and in thinking. In a word, however, that revolution can be defined by efficiency.

Whether it is efficiency in production, in supply chains or in fuel economy, the mantra of efficiency can be a game changer for American automakers.

Consequently, I was very excited to hear that Ford is in discussions with Toyota regarding efficiency. Whether production efficiency or hybrid vehicle efficiency, it's obvious Ford can learn a thing or two from Toyota. While some analysts have questioned what Toyota might have to gain from a partnership with Ford, I say they have a lot to gain.

For example, yesterday, I noted that a hybrid partnership would benefit Toyota by making their hybrid powertrain more standard, which would give suppliers more incentive to develop Toyota-friendly hybrid parts. Obviously, more hybrid suppliers would lead to cheaper hybrid parts. Furthermore, Toyota would also receive a license fee from Ford which would help fund Toyota's hybrid development costs.

While none of this might work out, I think there is great potential for both companies. Obviously, Ford needs help, and Toyota knows a strong Ford is good for Toyota, especially if Toyota can create a nice revenue stream from a successful Ford.

Regardless, Mulally should give Ford fans great hope.

Check out Toyota's hybrid sports car

So, you've heard about the FT-HS Hybrid Sports Concept that is supposed to debut at the Detroit Auto Show. A 0-60 mile per hour in 4 second hybrid sports car with 400 hp can claim the attention of both many hybrid fans, as well as sports car fans. What really has me interested about this vehicle, however, is the use of carbon fiber. With its ability to cut the weight of many automobiles in half, but also making them stronger, carbon fiber holds great potential. Carbon fiber plug-in hybrid vehicles, for example, could essentially end the need for liquid fuel for most in the U.S., enabling the far majority of drivers to drive purely powered by electricity. Of course, you'd still be able to fill up with liquid fuel when needed.

Anyway, for some cool pictures of the FT hybrid, check out Winding Road.

Democrats ready to give more subsidies to biofuels

Already, ethanol is an incredibly subsidized product, as is the corn from which most ethanol is derived. Yet, the profit margins for ethanol producers are actually greater than oil profit margins. For many, this isn't a problem because of the belief than ethanol is more green than petroleum, or that ethanol helps reduce foreign oil dependency. Many Democrats in Congress also have the same belief and those Democrats are preparing to roll back tax subsidies for oil companies and use them for biofuels according to the Detroit News.

Still no word, however, on whether Congress is going to do anything to promote hybrid vehicles, including plug-in hybrid vehicles.

What kind of help is Ford seeking from Toyota?

Updated: 2:07 PM Pacific

There are rumors coming out of Japan that Ford is seeking some kind of assistance from Toyota, but it is not known exactly what kind of assistance Ford is exploring. Nonetheless, early reports indicate that Ford is interested in Toyota's hybrid and fuel cell technology. With fuel economy and global warming becoming ever more important issues in the U.S., it isn't surprising that Ford might be seeking more hybrid assistance from Toyota.

Already, Ford utilizes some Toyota hybrid technology for its hybrid vehicles, the Escape hybrid and the Mercury Mariner hybrid. Thus, could Ford be seeking help on another hybrid vehicle?

Since tax credits for Toyota hybrids have been reduced, the sales of Toyota hybrids have slowed. In this market, a serious Prius challenger might be able to make some important gains in the hybrid vehicle segment, especially for a company like Ford. Moreover, if Toyota helped Ford challenge the Prius, Toyota would still make money off of the deal by licensing their hybrid technology - a move in which Toyota has claimed significant interest.

Hoping for a smart green revolution from Congress

There has been much buzz in the media regarding how the Democratic control of Congress is going to help the green revolution. While there is no doubt that Democrats will pass more 'green' legislation than the previous Republican Congress, there is still much cause for concern. For example, "The politics surrounding environmental issues have proved hard to predict, largely because the potential economic impact of stronger regulation tends to scramble partisan loyalties. Democrats from auto-making states, for example, have fought efforts to mandate stricter miles-per-gallon rules for vehicles." (more)

Currently, the top buzz words coming from the Democratic agenda have largely been focused on global warming and alternative fuels, especially ethanol.

Obviously, global warming is an important issue, but when there are studies that indicate that far more global warming pollution is caused by the livestock industry than all the emissions from all forms of transportation combined, one has to take pause. Of course we should make cleaner automobiles; however, why is the smaller problem the center of all the global warming attention?

Even worse, it seems the Democratic preferred answer to global warming is ethanol. First, corn-based ethanol is not very environmentally friendly. Yes, it might be more environmentally friendly than petroleum, but is it enough more? Without doubt, I say no. Second, ethanol is also seen as a way to protect American automobile jobs, but at what cost? I simply don't see how E85 Hummers, Expeditions and Nitros are really an answer to global warming, foreign oil dependency or American jobs - at least in the long term.

Over the last several decades, almost every single advance in fuel efficiency has only produced heavier and more powerful vehicles - resulting in greater foreign oil dependency and pollution. In order for America to truly fight global warming and foreign oil dependency, while protecting American jobs, very advanced technology will be required - as fast as possible.

The entire American automobile psyche must evolve.

Of course, ethanol can help, particularly if it is used to top off a flex-fuel plug-in hybrid vehicle that only needs a few gallons of liquid fuel every month - if ever. Yet, I have heard very little coming out of the Democratic camp regarding hybrid cars and real world legislation.

If America takes the slow road to advanced hybrid technology, Toyota won't. Hyundai probably won't either. And if you make it profitable for American automakers to make E85 guzzlers, then you can expect to wait far longer for American automakers to focus on flex-fuel plug-in hybrids.

Ultimately, American automakers and American consumers have to change dramatically, and that change will require significant help from the government. Hopefully, Congress will focus on the the future, not just today's political pork and paybacks.

3 Hybrids make Forbes hottest cars for 2007

Forbes magazine picked three hybrid cars as part of their Hottest Cars for 2007. Granted two of their picks are luxury hybrids, but they are still hybrids and fuel economy did affect Forbes' decision. The Lexus GS 450h "can do zero to 60 mph in only 5.2 seconds — better than many sports cars — yet it has EPA fuel-economy ratings of 28 mpg city/27 mpg highway. This sexy-looking Lexus is both fast and efficient." The other luxury hybrid was the Lexus LS 600h L "Rather than developing a 12-cylinder version of its top luxury sedan to compete with Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz, Lexus opted for a gas/electric hybrid powertrain and invented the world's first full-hybrid V8." Rounding out Forbes hybrid picks was the Toyota Camry hybrid, which Forbes said, "All together the system makes 192 hp and up to 203 pound-feet of torque and runs through a continuously variable transmission to provide performance that beats a standard four-cylinder Camry."

2010: The end of the hybrid vehicle hoax

So, Hyundai has claimed that around 2010 the hybrid vehicle will begin to become the standard powertrain for automobiles. GM has claimed the future is electric, but the electric future is dependant upon lithium-ion batteries about 3 - 4 years away from full production reality. As hybrid electrics offer greater range than purely electric vehicles, one must assume - as GM has also indicated - that an electric future also means many more hybrid vehicles. Besides, a full hybrid powertrain generates electricity, so why wouldn't you utilize that capability?

Nissan, another hybrid naysayer, is now pursuing a joint venture to develop lithium-ion batteries for their new line of hybrids set to launch around 2010. Why?

(Full Story)

Nissan considering hybrid battery venture

Nissan is "mulling" a partnership with NEC Corp. to develop lithium-ion batteries for hybrid cars and other fuel efficient technologies. "Business daily Nihon Keizai reported on Thursday that Nissan and NEC would set up a joint company next year, aiming to begin mass production of the batteries by 2010." (more)

While Nissan will offer the Altima hybrid in 2007 - its first hybrid - the hybrid Altima will be produced from leased Toyota technology. By 2010, however, Nissan hopes to offer its own hybrid vehicles based on proprietary technology, and a new line of batteries.

Hybrids Plus will convert Escape hybrid to PHEV for New York

According to a press release from Hybrids Plus, Inc., "The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) has awarded Hybrids Plus, Inc., working in partnership with ShurePower, Inc., a contract to convert a Ford Escape hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) to a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. This project, as part of the New York State Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) Technology Initiative, is proving the viability of PHEV technology and the related environmental benefits when applied to the sport utility vehicle (SUV). The major benefit of converting an HEV to a PHEV is increased reliance on clean electric power and significantly improved gasoline mileage per gallon." (Press Release)

Excited about NAIAS

I really enjoyed the recent Los Angeles Auto Show. Aside from seeing some upcoming hybrid vehicles, such as the Yukon hybrid, and some redesigned hybrids, such as the 2008 Ford Escape hybrid, it was observing the people at the show which I found most interesting. Would Auto Show visitors be interested in hybrids? Which hybrids would attendees be most interested in, etc (Read More).

The North American International Auto Show, however, is expected to offer several new hybrid related concepts - perhaps even some plug-in hybrids - and the NAIAS is THE auto show. Moreover, since I have been invited to the launch of a Chevy electric concept vehicle, I'm even more excited.

Hopefully, this unusual winter offers a warmer than usual visit to Detroit!

Ford to spend $80 million to market one vehicle

Sure, hybrid cars are an expensive technology for automakers to develop. Yet, Ford is going to spend $80 million on a launch blitz for the new Edge. That sounds pretty expensive as well. When you consider that the Big 3 spend billions of dollars every year on advertising, it does make you wonder if hybrids are really so expensive. (more)

Auto Alliance Change in Leadership: Good or Bad?

Dave McCurdy, a conservative Democrat, will take over the leadership position of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. Now that Democrats are taking over Congress, one might expect huge changes in fuel efficiency and global warming pollution. But should we?

"The Auto Alliance made a fine choice in hiring Dave McCurdy as its president," U.S. Rep. John Dingell, D-Dearborn, said in a statement. "His integrity is unquestioned, his political instincts are sound, and his exceptional judgment will serve the Alliance remarkably well." (more)

McCurdy, a conservative Democrat, and Dingell, a protectionist Democrat unwilling to risk any union jobs in the auto industry in the name of fuel efficiency, will probably be a perfect match. They will make a lot of noise, but not accomplish much, at least regarding fuel efficiency. They will, however, make those invested in ethanol very rich.

Small car crash tests and hybrids

I think that America would be well served by moving towards smaller vehicles; however, many Americans are very resistant to such a move, especially after recent crash tests. While some might argue small cars would be safer if big vehicles were taken off the road, such a move simply doesn't seem like it has the political legs to see reality. As a result fuel efficiency is going to have to be achieved with technology and hybrid technology seems like a no-brainer.

Honda's Good Year & Fuel Efficiency

Earlier this week Honda announced that its great year in sales would result in more investment in fuel efficient vehicles. While there was no indication that Honda's increased investment in fuel efficient vehicles would include hybrids, Honda's success does show that fuel efficiency is becoming much more of a consumer concern.

Hybrid Cars Blog Updates

You might notice some articles being republished if you receive feeds from HybridCarsBlog. Over the last several weeks, I've had some technical difficulties which prevented the users of the Firefox Browser from being able to follow some links. For new posts, those issues should be resolved. I might repost some of more of the older articles over the next few days as well. Sorry for any inconvenience.

All I want for Christmas is a plug-in hybrid vehicle

Lately, I've received a number of inquiries about where to buy plug-in hybrids. This doesn't surprise me. I want a plug-in hybrid. Still, the technology isn't fully baked, at least not for mass production. Consequently, you can't venture down to your local auto dealer and buy a plug-in hybrid.

Sure, you can convert a hybrid into a plug-in hybrid, and while I envy those whom have converted current hybrid cars into plug-in hybrids, I'm just a little short of cash at the moment for such a venture.

Nonetheless, what is it about plug-in hybrids that is so appealing even to consumers not interested in current hybrids? Sure, I totally believe in the potential of such technology, but there is no doubt plug-in technology is going to be expensive, at least in the short term. Thus, if plug-in hybrids offered an end to foreign oil dependency and a solution to transportation-caused global warming, but no cost savings to American consumers, would so many consumers still be so excited?

Is the excitement regarding plug-in hybrid vehicles for many consumers focused upon doing the right thing or on saving lots of money at the gas pump?

For those whom don't buy American autos

Many whom drive hybrid cars or are interested in hybrid cars are often not very interested in American automobiles because of the Big 3's over reliance upon fuel inefficient vehicles. Still, if GM offered a plug-in hybrid vehicle before any other automaker, would you be interested? Would it change your opinion about GM? Would you wait until either Toyota or Honda offered their own plug-in hybrid?

Chevy to reveal electric vehicle at NAIAS

On Sunday, January 7th, Chevy will reveal an electric concept vehicle at the North American International Auto Show. While GM has been accused of killing the electric vehicle, the automaker has recently claimed that the future is electric. In addition to an electric concept vehicle, there is great speculation that GM might also debut a plug-in hybrid at the Detroit show. Or, perhaps the Chevy offers both possibilities?

German vehicles to diesel into America

German automakers are hoping to leave hybrid cars in the dust and convert Americans into clean diesel guzzlers, rather than gasoline guzzlers. "That is the bet European automobile manufacturers are making as they talk the talk of gas-electric hybrid engines to show they care for the environment, but walk the walk down the diesel trail." (more)

Why is that hybrid vehicles are only seen as environment savers? Obviously the environment is a huge reason that many Americans buy hybrids, but just as many buy hybrids because of foreign oil dependency. Clean diesel technology simply isn't going to end foreign oil dependency, however, plug-in hybrid technology could.

Is global warming the MAIN reason to oppose ethanol

O.K., global warming isn't the main reason to oppose ethanol, however, global warming is the main reason to oppose ethanol as the solution to both foreign oil dependency and global warming gases. How can we put all our eggs in the alternative fuels basket when the same scientists warning the world about global warming also claim that today's global warming is going to lead to extreme weather, such as mini-ice ages, extreme droughts, massive hurricanes, flooding, etc, etc.? All of these conditions could wipe out the entire grain belt of the U.S. - our energy supply (not to mention our food supply) - for a year, for a decade, for a millennium.

While there is nothing wrong with pursuing alternative fuels, they cannot be pursued at the expense of efficiency.

Today, hybrid cars offer the greatest tool for efficiency. In addition, hybrids can utilize any alternative fuel developed. Most important, however, creating lighter vehicles with plug-in hybrid technology could easily increase fuel efficiency by more than 50%, even as much as 75% if carbon fibers, instead of steel, were used to build automobiles.

In the short term, alternative fuels are a distraction - an excuse - enabling automakers to continue to build more and more inefficient vehicles. 'Yes, it's a 12 mpg Hummer, but it uses flex-fuel' is neither the answer to energy dependence nor to global warming.

NO. Hybrid vehicles are not losing their appeal

Today, Roland Jones of MSNBC asked the question, Are hybrid vehicles losing their appeal?

No, Roland, they are not. Also, Roland, how can you utilize the Honda Accord hybrid to discuss hybrid vehicle economics? First, the Accord hybrid isn't a hot-selling hybrid, it's possibly the worst selling hybrid. Second, it's a performance hybrid, and was not produced purely to achieve fuel efficiency.

Sure, the sales of hybrid cars are down. Automobile sales overall are down and expected to be down into 2007. Yes, hybrids are down more, but that fact has nothing to deal with appeal, Roland. Obviously, the fact that Toyota's hybrid tax credits have been cut in half is a key issue since the Prius is by far the best selling hybrid, as is the drop in gasoline prices.

But there is also a bigger, non-hybrid issue. Why are automobile sales down and expected to be down next year? Are automobiles losing their appeal? Or, do consumers have a little less financial power? If economic times are tight, it isn't surprising fewer consumers can justify paying more for a hybrid when the tax credit has been cut in half and when gas prices are down.

Nonetheless, consumers are very interested in hybrid cars, especially the hybrids of the future. Consumers are not stupid, and they know the best of hybrid vehicles is yet to come. Currently, the public appears to be particularly fascinated with the idea of plug-in hybrid vehicles. So, since consumers have less cash and gas prices are low, many are waiting for next generation hybrid technology.

And no, Roland, diesel is not an alternative. Diesel might compete with hybrids today in some driving conditions, but reliance upon diesel instead of gasoline will NEVER end foreign oil dependency. Next generation hybrid technology, however, certainly has the capability to end foreign oil dependency.

Foreign oil dependency: Security versus profits

So, we know that America's current electric grid could handle the power demands of converting conventional automobiles into plug-in hybrid vehicles. We know that such a move would reduce pollution. We know that using advanced carbon-fibers could produce 50 percent lighter vehicles that are stronger than today's vehicles. We know that adding plug-in hybrid technology to such vehicles would produce super strong, super fuel efficient automobiles capable of ending foreign oil dependency and drastically reducing all forms of pollution.

The only thing we don't know is, are such vehicles profitable to automakers? While it is a sad commentary on society that health and security are bean-counted against profitability, that is today's reality.

Still, wouldn't funding an automotive revolution via advanced technology be a worthy investment for government via less military protection of oil, for automakers via retooling their entire operations in state of the art technology geared for the future, and for consumers via increased fuel savings and security?

Why not spawn the next great revolution in human history?

Worsening traffic congestion underscores need for hybrid technology

According to a very interesting article in BusinessWeek, traffic congestion has increased significantly every year since 1982, and within 10 years the problem is going to increase drastically, even in areas with only medium congestion.

What are the costs? "In 2003, the wasted time and fuel due to congestion cost the U.S. population $63.1 billion. This translates to nearly $800 per traveler and 2.3 billion gallons of fuel!" Unfortunately, the BW article also points out the lack of any easy solutions to this worsening problem. One can only imagine how many billions of gallons we will be wasting by 2010 - scary!

Greater congestion is simply the future, which underscores the need for hybrid technology. When it comes to real world fuel economy, automobiles perform horribly in congestion, yet hybrid cars offer significant improvements in these conditions. More important the potential of hybrids in these conditions is just emerging. Plug-in hybrids could largely function gasoline-free in such conditions.

Isn't it time to really start thinking about the future?

Fuel economy estimate revisions and hybrids

On Monday the EPA announced that it was going to revise fuel economy estimates on vehicles to provide better information to consumers. Mileage estimates for hybrids will also be affected. Accordingly, "mileage estimates for gas-electric hybrids probably will be 20 to 30 percent lower for city driving and 10 to 20 percent lower on the highway, the agency said."

One can expect hybrid critics to again claim that hybrids don't make sense, yet when real world fuel economy of all vehicles is compared - especially class-by-class - it will be demonstrated that hybrids are still significantly more fuel efficient than conventional vehicles.

Still, the real point regarding the EPA's revisions shouldn't be focused on hybrids, it should be focused on the fact that, in reality, automakers are horribly failing CAFE. Yet, ironically, the real world fuel economy of conventional vehicles isn't going to affect CAFE requirements. The fact that automakers have essentially violated the will of Congress for decades - causing massive increases in foreign oil dependency - just doesn't matter.

(Source:MSNBC)

Carlos Ghosn keeps talking about hybrids

Nissan executives keep talking about the profitability of hybrid cars, yet they keep promoting plans to develop hybrids. Recently Carlos Ghosn told reporters at the opening of a new Nissan design studio in the Tokyo suburb of Atsug, "The hybrid as a technology is a promising technology, we have always said it. Nobody can ignore that hybrids can be one potential solution for mass market car sometime in the future." He further stated, "That is a promising technology that we need to work on, and we need to develop, and we need to be ready in case this technology breaks through and becomes a mass-market technology. Which I think it's still not." (more)

DOE study shows grid can handle plug-in hybrid vehicles

A new study by the Department of Energy demonstrates that America's power grid could accommodate converting 84% of all vehicles into plug-in hybrids. Since plug-in hybrids could handle the average daily commute of most Americans, the study assumed owners would primarily fill up during non-peak hours - such as after 5.

"The estimates didn't include hydro, renewables or nuclear plants. It also didn't include plants designed to meet peak demand because they don't operate continuously. We still found that across the country 84 percent of the additional electricity demand created by PHEVs could be met by idle generation capacity," stated PNNL energy researcher Rob Pratt.

But the good news doesn't end there. The study also concluded that converting to electricity would also be much better for the environment, reducing global warming emissions and other forms of pollution.

On the downside, it could take from 5 - 8 years for plug-in hybrids to pay for themselves for consumers. Of course, since we'd end foreign oil dependency, why not offer some nice tax credits to consumers and subsidies to automakers? Then it's a win-win for everyone.

On a sidenote, Straightline from Edmunds.com also referenced the article and stated, "One thing no one has addressed however is: What happens when there is a regional power outage? If a hurricane or ice storm knocks out all the power in your area, how are you going to recharge your vehicle? If most people convert to this method, it could be a real problem."

What do you do? You fill it up with fuel, buddy. It's a plug-in hybrid, not an electric vehicle. It can use both fuel and electricity.

(Source: The AutoChannel)

Global Warming - It's the cows, not the cars

So, you want a gas-guzzling SUV, but you're afraid that people will accuse you of destroying the environment? Too bad, they will probably keep harassing you if drive a gas-guzzling SUV. Nonetheless, you could stop eating beef and let them know that you are fighting the REAL source of global warming.

"Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together," states a new 400-page report by Britain's Food and Agricultural Organisation according to The Independent.

From fertilizer production to transportation to deforestation and pollution, eating beef is causing FAR, FAR more problems than even driving a gas-guzzler - at least in terms of pollution. Still, don't eat your veggie burger in your Hummer and think everything is O.K. - you're still funding terrorism and risking National Security.

Nissan still going to develop electric and hybrid vehicles

While numerous executives at Nissan have been hybrid skeptical, Nissan is still going to begin a five year green program which will include the production of hybrid vehicles, electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and bio-ethanol vehicles. While Nissan remains a bit cautious regarding hybrid cars and their electric motors, the company has also acknowledged that electric motors very well could replace internal combustion engines.

In 2007, Nissan will offer the Altima hybrid in some states, but that hybrid is mainly being built to meet the tougher emissions requirements in some states, and the hybrid Altima is being built from leased Toyota technology.

(AFP)

Tax incentives for oil drillers more important than clean vehicle tax incentives

Even in the final days of the current Republican led Congress, tax incentives for oil drillers are still of extreme importance. Even in these days of astronomical oil company profits, more tax incentives for oil companies are still far more important than tax incentives for hybrid cars and other clean vehicle technologies.

If filthy-profit rich oil companies can't afford to do more Gulf drilling without tax incentives, then too bad. If that means higher gas prices in the short term, then I guess it will just make alternative fuels and hybrid cars that much more cost-effective. Besides, the more we invest in alternative fuels and clean vehicle technologies, the less we'll have to be worried about the price of oil in the long term.

Toyota will offer plug-in hybrids as soon as technology is ready

Toyota is hearing the voice of Americans when it comes to plug-in hybrid vehicles, Jim Press, President of Toyota North America told the Inside Line. However, just as GM has indicated, plug-in technology just isn't quite ready for prime time. "We are hearing the voice of the customer, and we want [plug-ins] as much as anyone else," Press said. "It is not a lack of desire; it is a lack of science. We don't want to come out with a technology prematurely that might not succeed." So, if you are interested in plug-in hybrid technology, buy one of today's hybrids - its the best way to invest in tomorrow's hybrid technology.

Nissan VP calls hybrids "unprofitable"

"Hybrids today are not a very viable economic proposition. It's still a loss-making proposition and we'll see," said Dominique Thormann, Nissan North America's senior vice president for administration and finance. "People don't want to pay more for a hybrid. They get a tax credit for it but they don't want to pay the price for the cost of the hybrid," he said.

Of course, what else can anyone from Nissan claim? Imagine the V.P. claiming "Hybrids are profitable, which is why we don't offer any." Of course Nissan will soon offer the Altima hybrid, but they had to borrow technology from Toyota to do so.

On the other hand, Thormann also stated that half the cars sold in America are sold by companies losing money, so it isn't just about hybrid vehicles . Such a statement speaks to the larger issue facing the auto industry: The vehicles that are profitable simply aren't healthy for America or the world in terms of global warming and foreign oil dependency.

Yet, as more and more hybrid supplies are produced, those parts will become cheaper, as will hybrid vehicles. If hybrid vehicles can evolve into plug-in hybrids achieving 100+ mpg fuel economy - including a significant reduction in fueling costs - then hybrids could become cost-effective for consumers and profitable for automakers.

Of course, only some automakers have that vision.

Capitalism, Competition, Free Markets & Hybrid Tax Credits

Today, the Pentagon is one of the biggest proponents of energy independence. Why? Quite frankly, the cost of protecting America's oil habit is very expensive, and it is possibly the greatest threat to American National Security. Most citizens are even starting to understand the problems foreign oil dependency has and is creating. As a result, Congress created a new tax credit to help Americans purchase clean, foreign-oil-dependency fighting automobiles, such as hybrid cars.

The plan worked so well, that Toyota met its quota in less than a year, long before GM has even sold ONE full hybrid vehicle. Consequently, sales of Toyota hybrids have slowed in recent months. Sure, high gas prices have dulled people's interest in fuel economy, but it seems obvious that reduced tax credits are also an important part of the skid.

In America, where the virtues of capitalism, competition and free markets are loudly promoted in corporations and Congress, shouldn't such ideals also be used to fight for energy independence? If Toyota could sell another 60,000 hybrid vehicles right now, utilizing GM's unused credits before GM even offers a full hybrid, shouldn't they have that right?

Isn't protecting National Security more important than protecting Detroit's failures? Is America afraid to end oil dependency too quickly? Is the status quo really more important than National Security? Why are we punishing Toyota for doing too much to help America fight foreign oil dependency?

Why are there even quotas on the tax credits? There are no quotas on the tax incentives given to small business owners that buy the worst gas-guzzlers, yet there is NO incentive for small business owners to buy fuel efficient vehicles.

I guess that only makes sense to members of Congress.

While GM's Rick Wagoner can complain about unfair trade advantages and currency manipulation in places like Japan, Toyota has every right to complain about protectionist legislation coming out of the U.S. Congress.

If GM were forced to compete for those credits in a free market, you can bet they would have gotten more hybrids on the road much faster. Instead, Congress has essentially given them a safety net NOT to act faster.

Great job Congress! I mean its only our National Security at stake!

Automakers turning green? Poppycock

There has been a lot of buzz in the media about how automakers are going green and the Los Angeles Auto Show has been cited as an example. I say poppycock.

Sure GM debuted the Saturn Aura hybrid and the GMC Yukon hybrid in LA, but GM's real green buzz was really generated by GM's plug-in hybrid development announcement - even though the company gave no timeline for an arrival. Is it 3 years, five years, 10 years?

Anyway, at the LA Auto Show, GM put far more effort into marketing their massive lineup of huge Flex-fuel trucks and SUVs - not their hybrids. Saturn hybrids, for crying-out-loud, were practically hidden at the show.

While I would applaud flex-fuel hybrids, or very fuel efficient flex-fuel compact vehicles, I cannot call GM's flex fuel trucks and SUVs a huge green move. Flex-fuel guzzlers are little better than gas-guzzlers. Even worse, flex-fuel guzzlers seem too much like another excuse for GM not to focus on real fuel economy.

Aside from GM, Nissan did debut the Altima hybrid, and Ford displayed the newly designed 2008 Mercury Mariner hybrid and the 2008 Ford Escape hybrid, but Ford's real buzz was generated by the new Mustang more than anything. In reality hybrids were minor drivers for both Ford and Nissan at the LA Show.

Then there was a lot of talk about clean diesel and hydrogen. Blah, blah, blah.

Even Toyota, world leader in hybrid cars, was far more focused on promoting the Toyota Tundra, not its Hybrid Synergy Drive. Still, Toyota hybrids did drive significant buzz in LA and it was obvious many were checking out Toyota's hybrids as potential buyers, not just gawkers.

Ultimately, automakers have realized that Americans are interested in green issues, however, the keyword is interested. Most Americans are still unwilling to help fund the green revolution, and I think automakers are keenly aware of this fact. At this point in time, green marketing is possibly more important than green automobiles.

Americans might be interested in hearing and talking about the green revolution and energy independence, but they are definitely not yet willing to revolt against energy dependence by joining the green revolution.

Hybrid tax credits not on Congress' radar?

Toyota spokeswoman Martha Voss told the San Francisco Chronicle that hybrid tax credits do not seem to be on the radar screen of Congress, at least not in the near term. "There was talk of some people on the House and Senate side wanting to introduce bills" that would extend the hybrid tax credit for at least another year, Voss stated. "Since Congress changed hands, they're taking care of other business right now. They have a lot to do before they come back next year. We don't have any signals that there is something urgently pending," Voss says.

I wonder whether if it was GM or Ford that was running out of tax credits for their hybrid cars if Congress would take the matter more seriously? For some reason I'm sure Congress doesn't mind slowing down Toyota's foreign-oil dependency fighting success.

2007 Nissan Altima hybrid update

I was finally able to see the 2007 Nissan Altima hybrid at the Los Angeles Auto Show. Very nice. The price was not posted on this vehicle at the show, unlike most vehicles that were market ready. Since this new hybrid, Nissan's first, appears to be much more of a Camry hybrid contender, than a Prius contender, I'm sure its pricing will be more like the hybrid Camry.

Is there an issue more important than energy independence, right now?

Oil dependence aids terrorists, funds dictators and gives millions around the world a reason to point their finger at the imperialist, capitalist and evil American empire. Gas guzzling greed has produced complacency and ignorance that has stunted automotive development by focusing on speed and power rather than than on efficiency and clean technology. This greedy, ego-driven focus - produced by cheap oil dependence - has severely weakened the U.S. auto industry and now threatens the U.S. economy.

And for what? So, that yours is bigger than mine?

American automakers, their unions and representatives in Washington complain about imports and outsourcing, yet turn a blind eye to our extremely dangerous oil imports. How can one import be so good, yet another so bad?

One political party protects the oil industry, the other political party protects the gas-guzzler builders. Yet, our environment and National Security continue to deteriorate as politicians blame each other for a problem each party has contributed in creating.

Now politicians on both sides of the aisle are preparing to make energy independence the core issue for 2008 - at least in terms of political soundbites.

Why are waiting until 2008? I don't care about the next election, right now. I don't care about lame ducks, right now. I care about today, right now.

Right now, Congress could renew tax credits for Toyota hybrid cars. Right now, we could give small business owners the same tax incentives to buy clean vehicle technologies that we currently give small business owners to buy the worst gas-guzzlers.

When America went to the moon, it inspired the development of so many technologies and industries. Right now, striving for energy independence could do the same, while increasing National Security and fighting global warming.

Why isn't America doing more? Shouldn't we be doing everything we can, right now?

--> More on hybrid tax credits, etc.

Toyota hybrids at the LA Auto Show

Heading to the Los Angeles Auto Show this weekend, I had few expectations regarding Toyota and its hybrid vehicles. Pre-show hybrid buzz focused on the Aura and Yukon hybrids and GM's new green identity. Since, I started out on the GM side of the convention center, I thought the best of the show's hybrid displays were behind me, especially when I walked into the Toyota side of the convention center and saw Toyota Tundras everywhere.

Eventually, though, I did make my way through the Tundras and into Toyota's hybrid section.

The difference between GM's hybrid offerings and Toyota's was absolutely stunning. In fact, there was simply no comparison between Toyota and any other automaker at the show regarding hybrid vehicles. Ironically, Toyota's hybrid section was all business and no show gimmicks. There was a huge information bar where you could sit down, talk to a rep and obtain product literature. Then of course, there were Toyota's three hybrids, the Highlander hybrid, Camry hybrid and the Prius.

As I sat near the Toyota hybrid section I was amazed at the visitors to this area. This was a high traffic area, but it wasn't just people looking at hybrids. Here people were getting into hybrids - sitting in the front, then the back, opening the trunk, touching every gadget that the vehicles had to offer. These visitors looked like buyers.

Wow, I thought, not bad for a company without any new hybrid debuts. Then, however, I noticed the Lexus hybrid section and realized Toyota did debut a hybrid at the show, the Lexus LS600h L hybrid. While Lexus had the GS 450h hybrid the RX 400h hybrid at the show, in addition to a split 450h show gimmick, the LS 600h was the show stopper. Still, the Lexus hybrid section was pure auto show marketing, unlike the Toyota section, and it worked. The buzz around the Lexus hybrids was nothing short of phenomenal.

In terms of hybrid vehicles, Toyota didn't just dominate the LA Auto Show; it was the LA Auto Show.

GM's green side at the LA Auto Show

I spent the weekend at this year's LA Auto Show, and I have a lot to write on regarding that topic. I'll start with GM. There was a lot of pre-show hype regarding GM's new green revolution - as I've called it. Since I started my auto show tour on the GM side, I was very excited. Yet, I left the GM side of show unimpressed. Yes, I saw the Yukon hybrid and all of GM's Flex-fuel vehicles - every huge gas-guzzling one of them. Inevitably, a flex-fuel tank is still a tank.

The Yukon hybrid is, well, huge. Fine. Yet, the hybrid engine on display near the vehicle seemed to attract more attention than the hybrid itself. So, I went looking for GM's other hybrid debut, the Saturn Aura hybrid.

Saturn had a nice little hybrid section at the show that showcased a split Saturn Vue hybrid with lights demonstrating the different modes of its mild hybrid powertrain. It definitely caught people's attention - as they walked into the bathroom. Unfortunately, the display, just as with the Yukon hybrid, caught more attention than either the Vue hybrid or the Aura hybrid. And why did GM practically hide the Saturn hybrid display area?

Ultimately, I thought GM's green efforts were completely unimpressive, unless one believes flex-fuel is the solution to the world's energy problems. Unfortunately, I do not hold that view.

Camry hybrid green car of the year

The 2007 Toyota Camry hybrid was named the Green Car of the Year at the Los Angeles Auto Show. The Award, sponsored by Green Car Journal, was given to the Camry hybrid for its "mainstream attraction".

(Source: AutoblogGreen)