$2.00 Gas: The Calm Before the Storm?

There is a very good chance that by Thanksgiving, gas prices could land near $2.50. If things go real well, we might even see $2.00 gas. (more)

Is this a good thing? Ironically, I say it's a better thing for oil companies, than for consumers - at least in the long run.

Over the last several decades, whenever gas prices recede, gas consumption increases. Will this time be any different? As gas prices drop, so to will interest in hybrid cars, in ethanol, in clean diesel, etc. - so to will America's interest in ending foreign oil dependency.

Let's face it, most Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck. Can we really blame them for taking the cheaper path?

Of course, is it really cheaper? Even cheap gasoline prices in America still lead to huge profits in the hands of governments that not only HATE America, but that fund terrorism against America. Then there is the cost of enforcement. How much does our military presence in the Gulf cost - even when we aren't fighting wars in Iraq? Wouldn't a foreign-oil dependency-ending technological revolution be cheaper than this enforcement?

Of course, there is nothing like the status quo!

Thus, will Detroit finally step up to the plate and, regardless of gasoline prices, strive for the end of foreign oil dependency?

Unfortunately, I doubt it. Like many Americans, Detroit is going to do whatever is most profitable - at least in the short term.

Still, $2.00 gas won't last. There will be hurricanes in the Gulf again - maybe not this year, maybe not next year, but soon. China and India will keep exponentially increasing their oil demand, and Middle East tensions will get much worse before they truly improve.

The world now believes that oil is one of America's biggest Achille's Heals. While alternative fuels such as ethanol can help, only advanced automotive technologies can save America in the long run.

Will America have the wisdom and the vision to prepare for the future, or will we fall into our fat, lazy, apathetic and complacent ways? The next surge in gasoline prices might not just destroy the American auto industry, but the American economy as well.

As consumers, as citizens, we must make sure that we keep pressure on automakers and on government officials. Inevitably, few issues in our lives will have greater impact on our lives than foreign oil dependency. We can either let this addiction turn into a bigger crisis, or we can turn it into a revolutionary opportunity.

Which side are you on?

Why I hate GM

O.K. I don't really hate GM. Still, I'm not very fond of the corporation. Then again, I'm not very fond of most corporations. Even American corporations don't exist for Americans. Sure, American corporations provide jobs for Americans, but does that then excuse all corporate wrongdoings? Let us not forget even the Exxons of America provided jobs to Americans.

That's why GM really irks me. GM, as a corporation, doesn't care one crap about America. GM, as a corporation, cares only about shareholder value. Fine, that is the essence of corporations. (Finished in Comments)

Are stars good for the environment?

Leo and this star drive hybrid cars. This star promotes electric cars. This one promotes biofuels. According to Green wave surges onto pop culture's shores, "Environmental causes championed by scientists and watchdog groups are reaching wider audiences as they gain prominence in popular mainstream media."

Is all this star attention good for environmental issues? Or does all this star treatment lead to a backlash? I know for certain that there has been much backlash against the Toyota Prius because of its connection to Hollywood. Still, is star endorsement good for the environment, bad for the environment, or does it simply make no difference?

Toyota set to start building 48,000 Camry hybrids per year in U.S.

According to AutoWeek, Toyota is almost ready to begin building the Camry hybrid at its Georgetown, KY plant. The plant will produce around 48,000 hybrid Camry's per year, which should boost availability of Toyota's newest hybrid. Moreover, it will also increase the production of the Toyota Prius hybrid, which has seen a drop in production due to the release of the Camry hybrid. For more information on the new Camry in general, click here.

The Ford Escape hybrid versus the Saturn Vue mild hybrid

Over the last couple of months several people have challenged my view that the Ford Escape hybrid is a better hybrid than GM's Saturn Vue mild hybrid. In particular they claim the Escape hybrid's more expensive hybrid technology isn't justified by its real world gas mileage. Just this morning I responded to such a blog entry.

Escape hybrid versus Saturn Vue hybrid

Foreign oil dependency and cheaper gas prices

If gas prices drop significantly, will Americans continue to care about the impact of foreign oil dependency? Unfortunately, I think that cheap gas will only lead to more gas-guzzlers, even if a direct link is firmly and clearly established to terrorism against the U.S. (Not that it already hasn't been established). Or, has America changed?

R.I.P. - The Honda Insight

Production of the Honda Insight hybrid is now over. Yet, the love of thousands of Insight owners will love on. If you are one of those lovers check out this New York Times article.

Can the Prius really be 'sporty'?

You might have heard that in 2007, the Toyota Prius will come in a new Touring Edition, that is more 'sporty' than the traditional Prius. According to Motortrend the new Prius will offer "standard driver and front passenger seat-mounted side airbags and front and rear side curtain airbags" along with "European-tuned suspension and 16-inch alloy wheels".

Fuel economy now most important to buyers?

According to Consumer Reports, fuel economy is now the most important factor for car buyers.

"When asked what factors they considered most important in a new car, the largest number of respondents - 27 percent - said "fuel economy." That was slightly higher than the responses for "reliability," which was the top consideration for 25 percent." (more)

I say it was only a matter of time.

Isn't it ironic? GOP tells Detroit 'Drop Dead'

I like Daniel Howes of the Detroit News, but I think he wrote an absolutely ridiculous article, Top GOP leaders sending message to Big 3: Drop dead.

"But meet with Detroit's automakers? Nah, why should the president care whether U.S.-owned automakers, burdened by fierce foreign competition and cumulative decisions that threaten to swamp them, are fighting for their collective lives? Instead, key Republicans and the White House are reprising President Ford's message to New York back in the mid-'70s: "Drop dead."

Wow! So, was it Democrats that have protected Detroit's fuel inefficiency for decades? Was it Democrats that forever blocked increased fuel economy standards? Was it Democrats that protected SUVs for decades?

Give me a break, Daniel. If not for Republicans preventing the Carter administration from ending the SUV craze, before it even started, Detroit would already be a very different place.

Detroit should have realized that cheap gas couldn't last forever - that warning bell has been ringing, quite loudly, for decades. Sure the auto industry is important for America, but not at the expense of our National Security. America is literally spending trillions of dollars to maintain cheap oil.

Screw the unions, screw trade barriers. It all comes down to product. Ultimately, GM and Ford blew it. The first hybrid cars should have been American, without question. No country has more to gain by increasing fuel efficiency. More important, if fuel cells are the holy grail for Detroit, then hybrids make fuel cells happen sooner.

I say Detroit should drop dead until it starts acting like an American company - you know - a company that fights for freedom, not increased foreign oil dependency.

Buy your Toyota hybrid by Sept. 30

Are you interested in a Toyota hybrid? Is the hybrid car tax credit important? Then you must buy your Toyota hybrid by Sept. 30. After that time, the tax credit for Toyota hybrids will be cut in half. Thanks to the government's capped tax credits and the popularity of the Toyota Prius, time is running out!

Buy your Toyota hybrid by Sept. 30

Are you interested in a Toyota hybrid? Is the hybrid car tax credit important? Then you must buy your Toyota hybrid by Sept. 30. After that time, the tax credit for Toyota hybrids will be cut in half. Thanks to the government's capped tax credits and the popularity of the Toyota Prius, time is running out!

Prius, Escape hybrid break even in 3 years

According to a study by Edmunds.com, many hybrid cars now pay for themselves over time. For example, both the Toyota Prius and the Ford Escape hybrid can pay for themselves in just 3 years when gas is $3.00 and you drive at least 15,000 miles per year. Additionally, the Saturn Vue, Camry hybrid and Civic hybrid will pay for themselves in 6 years.

Of course, good things never last. Because tax credits for hybrid cars are capped at 60,000 vehicles per manufacturer, the full tax credit for the Prius and other Toyota hybrids, will only be available until Sept. 30. After that time, Toyota hybrid buyers will only qualify for half the tax credit.

As for the other hybrid vehicles, you still have plenty of time.

The Best Hybrid Vehicle

So, you think the Toyota Prius is the best hybrid vehicle, or maybe you like the styling of the Honda Civic hybrid?

Maybe you only like SUVs and so you believe the Ford Escape hybrid is the best hybrid available?

Well, unfortunately, the best hybrid vehicle simply isn't being produced.

So, what would it take to create the best hybrid? In a word, a plug. (Finished in Comments)

London adding 117 new hybrids to police fleet

The London Metropolitan Police force will be adding 117 new Honda Civic hybrids to its fleet.

(Source: Just Auto)

Malayasia plans to develop hybrid cars

To fight high gas prices, the Prime Minister of Malaysia has announced a plan to develop a line of hybrid cars. "Under the 9th Malaysia Plan, the Government has outlined the need to encourage the use and development of sustainable and renewable energy resources", the Malaysian newspaper The Star reported. The hybrid in question will be assembled locally by Johor-based LM Star Autoworld Sdn Bhd and offer 50 percent fuel savings with a new technology called hydroxene, The Star wrote. (AutoblogGreen)

Plug-in hybrid vehicles are ideal for fuel cell development

For years I have been promoting hybrids, not just to reduce foreign oil dependency or to clean the environment, but to push the evolution of the automobile. As it turns out, plug-in hybrid vehicles might just be the perfect platform for the utilization of fuel cells. (More)

Kia, Hyundai hybrid vehicles: Not any time soon

When Hyundai Motor Co. Chairman Chung Mong Koo went to jail on bribery charges, plans for hybrid cars from either Kia or Hyundai were also jailed. While the chairmen is no longer in jail, his health is ailing as he deals with accusations of scandal. Unfortunately, it is becoming quite clear that we shouldn't expect to see any Kia or Hyundai hybrids for at least a few years.

(Source for Chung's Health: Automotive News)

The connection between the Prius and the Hummer

There is no connection between the Toyota Prius and the Hummer. Thus, when I saw the headline, Prius: As Obnoxious as a Hummer?, I almost ignored reading the article, but, inevitably, I couldn't resist, especially after I read the article, Prius Responsibility.

The author notes, "As a dyed-in-the-wool enthusiast, I find superficial excess repulsive in whatever form it takes. Yes, I think heavy-duty trucks and SUVs are a garish display of vehicular excess unless they're towing, hauling, or otherwise justifying their gluttonous existence. But it wasn't until the second-generation Toyota Prius became the darling of the Hollywood left and the Brie & Merlot quasi-literati crowd that similar feelings of disdain for this posterchild of parsimony began to well up inside me."

Wow! While I understand what the writer is saying, and while I also share some of his disdain, I also know many Prius drivers that vote Republican and drive a Prius because of National Security beliefs.

Sometimes generalizations and stereotypes are just that, generalizations and stereotypes.

Finally, the author concludes, "So at the end of the day, do I hate Priuses or their drivers? Not necessarily. Just drop the "Look at me! I'm saving the environment! Aren't I great?" attitude and that your car is superior when there are other models out there that are as fuel-efficient or better."

Here the author again makes an assumption that Prius buyers only buy the Prius because of 'looks'.

How ridiculous! First, Toyota designed the Prius in such a manner because of aerodynamics and that design leads to better fuel efficiency. It also leads to better cargo space. Second, when it comes to urban driving - stop-and-go driving - it is simply hard to compete with the Prius, even for the Honda Civic hybrid. So, what other vehicles out there do as well or better in urban driving conditions in terms of pollution and fuel efficiency - please? Third, the Prius has simply been road tested like no other hybrid and when buying an emerging technology, it isn't unusual for early adopters to stick with the most popular brand.

Sure there are some annoying Prius drivers out there, but there are a lot of cool Prius drivers out there as well. Let's not forget, critics constantly tell us that you can't save money buying hybrid cars, such as the Prius. Consequently, those Prius drivers have paid EXTRA money to try to make a better world, to try to fight pollution, to try to end foreign oil dependency.

That deserves at least a little respect.

What do you think of a lobbying group for hybrid vehicles?

A new lobbying group, Hybrid Owners of America, put together by the Newton, Mass.-based Civil Society Institute, is now advocating for new incentives for hybrid cars. (more) So, any thoughts out there? I HATE lobbyists. While I believe in advocating for more incentives for the buyers of hybrid vehicles and other fuel efficient technologies, I believe it should happen at the grassroots level. Lobbyists are the reason we have such a problem with foreign oil dependency in the first place. Sure, you might have to fight fire with fire sometimes, so I'll try to remain objective. Still, I'd rather align myself with citizens, not lobbyists.

E85 versus hybrid cars, AGAIN!

I have not been a big fan of E85 or Flex-fuel vehicles. If you are a consumer that has such a vehicle, and regularly fills up with E85, I applaud you. However, I DO NOT applaud either GM or Ford for flex fuel technology. For many years this technology was simply used to violate CAFE, and I seriously doubt that a line of Flex Fuel Hummers or Tahoes is really going to help the world.

If GM was installing this inexpensive technology in all vehicles, especially their small cars, I'd be a little more supportive. Nonetheless, the potential of ethanol driven from cellulose is definitely worth further investigation.

Still, I do not believe ethanol offers anywhere near a complete solution to America's oil and/or fuel problems.

For decades, the idea of a war for clean water has been gaining steam and even the Pentagon has alluded to such a possibility. Further, a new report by the WWF environmental organization, for example, warns that many First World cities are already facing serious water shortages and the problem is only expected to get worse -much worse - and significant blame belongs to agriculture. (more)

In the very near future, clean water could be worth more than oil, yet vast amounts of water will be required to irrigate and process our ethanol crops. And, what about the pollution from chemical fertilizers and other pesticides that will run off into our ever more important aquifers, lakes and rivers? Is it really worth it?

Certainly, ethanol is an interesting resource to explore, but if automotive companies only focus on fuel, rather than significantly better designed and significantly more fuel efficient vehicles, such as hybrid cars, ethanol addiction could easily lead to as many problems as foreign oil dependency.

Study indicates strong consumer interest in hybrids, including plug-in hybrids

A study by Synovate indicates the consumers are very knowledgeable about hybrid cars and that almost 50% of those surveyed would consider buying one. Additionally, once consumers are informed about plug-in hybrid technology, consumer interest is also strong. (more)

Obama's gas guzzling hypocrisy

Illinois Senator Barack Obama told an audience that gas-guzzling was a major problem for the U.S. and that higher mileage hybrid cars and other fuel efficient technologies were the solution. Of course, Mr. Obama left in a GMC Envoy. According to his press secretary, "The vehicle senator obama travels in while in illinois is a Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV), which can run on e85, a blended fuel made of 85 percent ethanol. So he in fact was practicing what he preached at the town hall meeting in Metropolis yesterday when he said we must drive fewer gas-guzzling vehicles." (more)

Keyword in that sentence is can. Since there are hardly any E85 stations in Chicago, where Mr. Obama resides in Illinois, are we to believe that Mr. Obama regularly fuels his flex fuel vehicle with E85? Without E85, isn't Mr. Obama gas guzzling? Also, since E85 is in such limited supply, isn't all fuel-guzzling bad?

The Automobile: A case study in American stupidity?

The other day I was at a restaurant. As I looked through the menu, I knew I already knew what I really wanted, fish tacos and garlic fries. Ultimately, however, I ended up with a cup of soup and a salad. Since I knew that I was going to have a couple of beers – I was at a microbrewery for crying-out-loud – I thought I should at least eat healthy.

Yet, in America, we don’t seem to ask the question of cost-to-benefit very often, especially when it comes to automobiles. The only question that seems to matter is 'Do I look cool?'

As Americans, far too often, we do what we want in the whim of the moment and deal with the consequences later – if at all.

Consequently, I couldn’t help but laugh when I read some of Rick Wagoner’s comments at the auto industry's Management Briefing Seminars in Traverse City. For example Wagoner stated, “Some of the things that we all believe are necessary to ensure the continued strength of the (manufacturing) sector, which I think is just vital ... we just don't see the leadership,” stated Wagoner regarding the White House and Congress.

Leadership!? Give me a break, Mr. Wagoner. When the country was attacked by terrorists supported by America’s foreign oil dependency, when hurricanes destroyed oil refineries and demonstrated America’s overly stretched oil addiction, what was GM’s leadership? (Completed in Comments)

Kia hybrid news?

Jalopnik is reporting an apparent photo of the dashboard of the Kia hybrid. So, what does it mean?

No Toyota plug-in hybrid until 2010?

Do you like hybrid cars, but you want to wait for a plug-in hybrid vehicle before making a purchase? Well, you might be waiting until at least 2010 before buying such a vehicle from Toyota according to new article in AutoWeek.

GM, Daimler and BMW hybrids: Talk, Talk, Talk

While I am very excited about the dual mode hybrid transmission that GM, DaimlerChrysler and BMW are working together to produce, I am equally as bothered by the lack of real results from this group.

"We believe that our two-mode hybrid is the best of the hybrid systems," said Andreas Truckenbrodt, executive director of DaimlerChrysler's hybrid programs, recently (more).

Don't tell me about it, show me.

Toyota has now sold more than 500,000 Toyota Prius hybrids. Neither GM, Dailmer nor BMW have sold 1 of their two-mode hybrids - NOT ONE!

It is actually quite possible that by the time that the GM et al alliance begins to roll out a competent supply of hybrid cars, Toyota will already be launching its THIRD generation of hybrid technology. Such technology, it has been rumored, could result in huge gains in both performance and fuel efficiency.

I really hope that two-mode hybrids live up to the hype. Even if they do live up to the hype, they still might not be able to live up to Toyota's real world experience.

News for hybrid cars this week

I've been sick this week, so I haven't been doing much writing. To top it off, I probably won't be doing much writing today, as I found out that someone threw a cinder block through my windshield last night - just another day in L.A.!

Anyway, over the weekend, I read an interesting article in the Detroit News, San Antonio joins hybrid-incentive trend. Aside from San Antonio joining the hybrid incentive trend, the article kind of paints the question, 'Do hybrid vehicles receive too many perks'?

The article references policies in Salt Lake City, for example, which - at times - are more favorable to small cars than some hybrid vehicles.

I think supporting small vehicles is great. Still, I don't believe that if every American drove a small car that America would be doing enough to fight oil addiction.

In fact, I'm not SURE we CAN'T do enough to fight oil addiction.

This week Toyota also released a press release noting that worldwide sales of the Toyota Prius hybrid have surpassed the 500,000 vehicle mark. While that is great P.R., what is the real impact of 500,000 cars? Not much.

Still, in America - even in the most unfavorable hybrid driving conditions, the Prius can achieve well over 40 mpg. How many compact cars achieve that kind of mileage? Then, when you add in stop-and-go traffic performance and emissions, it's pretty hard to top the performance of the Prius. And, when it comes to hybrid cars, this is just the beginning - better battery technology could easily double performance and fuel efficiency in just a few years.

Technologies, such as hybrids, represent the true power of the computer revolution and no country more than America has more to gain by embracing this revolution.

Of course some hybrids, such as the Lexus RX400h or the Honda Accord hybrid, are geared more for performance than fuel efficiency. Nonetheless, for the performance these hybrids provide, the fuel efficiency of these hybrids is nothing short of stellar. More important, buying such a car STILL invests in hybrid technology.

Let's face it, gas isn't going to get cheaper any time soon. Now that Prudhoe Bay is reducing capacity, places like California will almost certainly see $4.00 gas. In some areas of California, $5.00 gas won't be surprising before the end of this year.

Of course, if the situation in Israel-Iran-Lebanon-Syria continues to escalate, $5.00 gas will dominate all of America.

The world has changed and we're never going back to $25.00 barrels of oil. In fact, we're probably never going back to even $50.00 barrels of oil.

Ultimately, we cannot embrace hybrid technology fast enough.

Could hybrid vehicles become bargain cars?

Iran's Foreign Relations Vice Minister Manuchehr Mohammadi told Venezuelan state television, "The first consequence of these sanctions would be an increase in the price of oil to around $200 per barrel." (more)

Let's face it, the situation in the Middle East is not going to suddenly clear up. In fact, it's probably going to get far worse before it gets better. So, if $3.00 gas seems expensive, how will $4.00 or $5.00 gas feel? Don't think it can happen? Last year I guaranteed $3.00 gas in 2006. Now I guarantee America will see $5.00 gas in 2007. While I believe $5.00 gas won't last long, I also believe we won't fall below $3.00 per gallon in the next few years either.

How much of a bargain will hybrid cars be then?

GM's BioDiesel hybrid vehicle: When is the concept stage over?

"This unique concept, showcased in a Saab 9-3 Convertible, is the first vehicle to combine a fossil-free bioethanol fuel (E100) capability with electric-only propulsion by utilizing the advanced two-mode hybrid system which General Motors Corp. is co-developing with DaimlerChrysler and BMW Group. The Saab BioPower Hybrid Concept is capable of zero fossil fuel CO2 emissions while also enhancing performance and reducing energy consumption." (more)

To me, such hybrid cars demonstrate the potential that automobiles have to offer - not tomorrow, but today. Sure these vehicles cost more, but how much does it cost the American government to ensure cheap gasoline? I say, enough already GM, get these cars on the road! While I am a huge GM critic, such a vehicle would instantly convert me to a huge GM advocate.

Hybrids and the Third World

Many skeptics of hybrid cars often complain that hybrids are too expensive. While I agree that they are too expensive today, so too was my laptop computer just a couple of years ago. Not only was my laptop too expensive back then, but also my desktop, my cell phone, my PDA, my iPOD, etc., etc., back then. Inevitably, even hybrid technology - like these devices - will become much cheaper. Consequently, I firmly believe that so called Third World emerging markets, such as China and India, will soon desire clean vehicle technologies, such as hybrids, as well. These countries are already suffering ridiculous levels of pollution and millions of new automobiles will only exacerbate that problem. Ultimately, hybrid vehicles might even make more sense in these countries than in America. Of course, I'm biased in favor of hybrids, so, for an alternative opinion, check out the article Hybrids in the Third World?

Business Week helps pick your hybrid vehicle

O.K., so you've read all of my articles and you still can't decide which hybrid is best for you? While I don't believe that, you can still check out Business Week's latest article on hybrid cars, New choices boost hybrids into mainstream.

NY Times gives props to Escape hybrid

"The most pleasant and unexpected surprise was my mileage. I didn’t baby the Escape or try to coax high mileage from it, yet I had no trouble achieving — even exceeding — the E.P.A. estimates."

That was just part of the praise that Jerry Garrett gave to the Ford Escape hybrid in a recent NY Times article. While Garrett hasn't been a huge proponent of hybrid cars, he definitely gives the Escape hybrid a nice review. (More)