NYTimes Rips Lexus RX400h hybrid

In a new article NYTimes writer, JEFF SABATINI, rips on the Lexus RX400h hybrid because it provided few gains in fuel efficiency on his test drive. While a valid criticism, Mr. Sabatini, also acknowledges that hybrid vehicles do their best in city driving, yet Mr. Sabatini's test drives took place on highway drives of several hundred miles.
Mr.Sabatini also states, "But the government's testing procedure (for fuel economy) has a habit - one that seems to be exaggerated with hybrids." Actually, if Mr. Sabatini were being fair, he would have to acknowledge that essentially ALL vehicles fail to meet EPA fuel efficiency ratings. More important, as hybrids do less well on the highway, conventional vehicles do less well in the city.
In fact, Detroit lobbied the government NOT to allow the EPA to revise its testing methodologies, which consumer groups claim inflate conventional vehicle fuel efficiency as much as 35 percent. (Read more)
If Mr. Sabatini had spent a few days fighting Chicago traffic -as millions do everyday - the Lexus hybrid would have made significantly greater gains in fuel efficiency versus the conventional Lexus. Even more important, if Mr. Sabatini were to drive a Hummer, Escalade, Explorer, Escape or Suburban in the same Chicago traffic, each vehicle would have achieved far less than their EPA estimates - not to mention emitting far more pollution.
Obviously Mr. Sabatini had too much of an axe to grind to be fair or objective. He even goes out of his way to suggest that Toyota isn't as green as portrayed.
Perhaps not, yet Toyota is still greener than Ford, GM, and Chrysler. In fact, only Honda is more green. Number 2 isn't good enough?
Moreover, until millions of hybrids are sold, their sales will have little affect on foreign oil dependency or in cleaning the air. Thus, hybrids could be called a work in progress, and new hybrid batteries offer the potential for huge gains in efficiency. Witness the evolution of the first generation Toyota Prius to the second generation Prius.
Finally, we're talking about a Lexus here, right? People don't buy a Lexus solely because they are trying to save the planet, so let's be real. Nonetheless, buying a hybrid Lexus today could lead to more fuel efficient luxury hybrids tomorrow as the technology evolves.
That is the potential of this emerging technology. Isn't that the real point of the Lexus RX400h?
Labels: Escape hybrid, Ford, Ford Escape hybrid, Foreign Oil Dependency, fuel efficiency, GM, Honda, Hybrid Vehicles, Lexus hybrid, prius, toyota



6 Comments:
Heck, Lexus (neƩ Toyota,) even admits that the RX400h was meant as a performance-enhancement, not an economy-enhancement. (Same as Honda and the Accord Hybrid.) Heck, just look at the name. RX330 meaning 3.3 liter engine, RX400h meaning '4 liter equivalent' engine.
The 400h uses the same base engine as the 330, then adds hybrid on top. If it was really about fuel efficiency, they would have gone the route of the Civic Hybrid, and put a smaller engine in with hybrid to boost it back up to the same power level.
I've read recently that Toyota believes that it will increase the fuel efficiency of the Lexus RX400h in the future with software upgrades.
Still, as noted, it is a performance vehicle.
I just purchased an RX400h and I am more than pleased with the mileage and the comfort. I traded in a 2002 Lincoln Navigator which is a beautiful vehicle but a gas-hog. The RX gives me the same performance, comparable luxury and uses less gas. What's the downside?
I just purchased an RX400h and I am more than pleased with the mileage and the comfort. I traded in a 2002 Lincoln Navigator which is a beautiful vehicle but a gas-hog. The RX gives me the same performance, comparable luxury and uses less gas. What's the downside?
I just purchased an RX400h and I am more than pleased with the mileage and the comfort. I traded in a 2002 Lincoln Navigator which is a beautiful vehicle but a gas-hog. The RX gives me the same performance, comparable luxury and uses less gas. What's the downside?
There is no downside, especially if you - the consumer - is happy with your purchase.
Post a Comment
<< Home